On 10/11/07, Jesse Allen <the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/11/07, Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> wrote:
On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi
This is a bad Idea. We have a lot of different dlls related to printing:
comdlg32.dll compstui.dll gdi32.dll localspl.dll printui.dll shell32.dll wineps.drv winspool.drv
I vote for "printing" next to "gdi"
What's wrong with having a new printing component? Lumping *all* gdi/printing bugs into gdi-(printing) is a bad idea.
-- James Hawkins
How about "gdi-printing" and "gdi-video"?
No, because not all printing problems are gdi, and if you don't have gdi-printing, there's no need for gdi-video; just plain gdi works. The same argument goes for gdi-video. So, we should have: gdi printing and any bugs that are marked as wine-gdi-(printing) should be set to one or the other. -- James Hawkins