On 8/5/19 6:57 AM, Derek Lesho wrote:
I could, but then if Julliard wanted to pull in this patch without the others he'd have to perform a rebase.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:20 AM Rémi Bernon <rbernon(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
You could probably move this after PATCH 5/9, so that you don't have to change those lines again. -- Rémi Bernon <rbernon(a)codeweavers.com>
I think if you do msg_data->rawinput.mouse.data = input->mouse.data; queue_hardware_message( desktop, msg, 0 ); } + if (device && device->flags & RIDEV_NOLEGACY) + return FALSE; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE( messages ); i++) instead of msg_data->rawinput.mouse.data = input->mouse.data; queue_hardware_message( desktop, msg, 0 ); + + if (device->flags & RIDEV_NOLEGACY) + return FALSE; } for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE( messages ); i++) then it would work the same for this patch (even if you keep it first in the serie), and you will not have to change it again later on. -- Rémi Bernon <rbernon(a)codeweavers.com>