3 Jun
2006
3 Jun
'06
7:43 a.m.
"Dan Kegel" <dank(a)kegel.com> writes:
Are you willing to accept a patch which makes some common use cases work well, but does not address others?
If it's a solution that can be expanded later on to cover the other cases, yes, but not if it's a dead-end. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org