6 Jun
2012
6 Jun
'12
4:56 a.m.
On 06/06/12 11:52, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
This usage of list is broken here as well. list_init should be called before list_add_head (so calling it early in initialization code will fix both problems). There's no reason to call list_init on list entries, it should only be called on the actual list.
Oh, right, sorry for misleading. I made wrong assumptions looking at the patch. Jacek