24 Jan
2003
24 Jan
'03
6:15 p.m.
Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> writes:
The afore mentioned glibc guru did not have any ideas either.
There however is a happy but messy end, which appeared to me yesterday: Overwrite those 2 functions with a jump to our implementations.
I'm afraid that won't be enough. When using thread-local storage, glibc doesn't even call __errno_location any more, it directly stores errno into the thread storage using %gs. It seems the only solution is to make Wine threads work on top of libc threads, but that will be messy. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com