30 Oct
2010
30 Oct
'10
5:25 p.m.
On Saturday, October 30, 2010, Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I see quite a few people filing bugs that are only exposed when bundled native dlls are removed. I think it would be good to be able to group these bugs, perhaps with a 'purist' keyword. Anyone opposed?
Personally I don't see the point. The less keywords is the better IMO. Why not clarify the problem in the subject, like "xxx doesn't install without native yyy.dll" ?
I meant bugs that only occur by manually removing native dlls. The report summaries are usually clear enough, I was hoping to get an easy way to search for them and separate them from 'normal' bugs. -- -Austin