6 Dec
2002
6 Dec
'02
5:51 p.m.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes:
Well, depends on what you call "work" :))) I've attached what I had in mind for a generic wineapploader script.
The problem I see with the symlink is that it's too fragile. As soon as you move/rename anything it breaks. Copying the script is already better, but I also think we should hardcode the app name instead of relying on $0, so that you can rename the script and it still works.
Also, should I delete the intermediate files? I think I should, one can get to them by manually running winebuild.
Yes, and you should use temp file names I think. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com