Am 10.07.2016 um 19:38 schrieb Nikolay Sivov:
On 10.07.2016 20:31, André Hentschel wrote:
Hi,
comments inline
Am 08.07.2016 um 00:16 schrieb John Sheu:
+static void test_FiberLocalStorageCallback(PFLS_CALLBACK_FUNCTION cbfunc) { + DWORD fls; + BOOL ret; + PVOID val, val2; + + if (!pFlsAlloc || !pFlsSetValue || !pFlsGetValue || !pFlsFree) + { + win_skip( "Fiber Local Storage not supported\n" ); + return; + } + + /* Test that the callback is executed */ + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); + cbCount = 0; + fls = pFlsAlloc( cbfunc ); + ok( fls != FLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES, "FlsAlloc failed with error %u\n", GetLastError() ); + + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); + val = (PVOID) 0x1587; + fls_value_to_set = val; + ret = pFlsSetValue( fls, val ); + ok(ret, "FlsSetValue failed with error %u\n", GetLastError() ); + + val2 = pFlsGetValue( fls ); + ok(val == val2, "FlsGetValue returned %p, expected %p\n", val2, val); + + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); + ret = pFlsFree( fls ); + ok(ret, "FlsFree failed with error %u\n", GetLastError() ); + todo_wine + { + ok( cbCount == 1, "Wrong callback count: %d\n", cbCount ); + }
Please make those one-liners, like todo_wine ok(...); and the patch should be fine then
How is this a stopper?
It's not directly a stopper. But I personally really don't like it that way and it somehow prevents me from a sign-off. And I think I'll add myself as a Maintainer for that file, so the style should fit somewhat.