Adam Martinson <amartinson(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
@@ -236,7 +241,40 @@ extern int getopt_long_only (int ___argc, char *const *___argv, #endif /* HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
#ifndef HAVE_FFS -int ffs( int x ); + #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) + #define HAVE_FFS + static inline int ffs( int x ) + { + if (!x) + { + return 0; + } + else + { + int ret; + __asm__("bsfl %1, %0; incl %0" : "=r" (ret) : "r" (x)); + return ret; + } + } + #elif defined(__GNUC__) && GCC_VERSION >= 29503 + #define HAVE_FFS + #define ffs(x) __builtin_ffs(x) + #else + int ffs( int x ); + #endif +#endif
You'd have to show benchmarks to prove that this complexity is necessary. Given that ffs() should already be inlined on all decent platforms, I doubt you'd be able to demonstrate a difference (if anything, your version would be slower because of the extra increment). -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org