10 Aug
2006
10 Aug
'06
6:33 a.m.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote:
Exists a opened bug report about the problem which this patch is suposed to fix: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5625
Can someone give some comments for what this pach wasn't applied?
As far as I can see the patch seems to assume that the $http_proxy environment variable simply contains the hostname of the proxy. But I believe that its format is more along the lines of 'http://user(a)hostname:port/', user and port being optional. There may also be a way to specify a password ('user%password(a)...'?). -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.