2013/9/30 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead@gmail.com>

On 9/30/2013 00:51, Daniel Jeli�ski wrote:

+struct progress_list {
+ � �const DWORD progress_retval_init; �/* value to return from progress routine */
+ � �const BOOL cancel_init; � � � � � �/* value to set Cancel flag to */
+ � �const DWORD progress_retval_end; � /* value to return from progress routine */
+ � �const BOOL cancel_end; � � � � � � /* value to set Cancel flag to */
+ � �const DWORD progress_count; � � � �/* number of times progress is invoked */
+ � �const BOOL copy_retval; � � � � � �/* expected CopyFileEx result */
+ � �const DWORD lastError; � � � � � � /* expected CopyFileEx error code */
+} ;

�I don't see a point making them 'const'.

+static DWORD WINAPI progress(LARGE_INTEGER TotalFileSize,
+ � � � �LARGE_INTEGER TotalBytesTransferred,
+ � � � �LARGE_INTEGER StreamSize,
+ � � � �LARGE_INTEGER StreamBytesTransferred,
+ � � � �DWORD dwStreamNumber,
+ � � � �DWORD dwCallbackReason,
+ � � � �HANDLE hSourceFile,
+ � � � �HANDLE hDestinationFile,
+ � � � �LPVOID lpData)
+{
+ � �progressInvoked++;

Please pass all globals as context data with lpData, and please use 'void*' instead of LPVOID.

Good point about lpData. Still, does that make the patch invalid? Why didn't you mention that on the first review?