19 Sep
2008
19 Sep
'08
4:55 a.m.
Hi Juan, I indeed submitted a set of tests that included these cases. Specifically: http://www.nabble.com/PrintDlgEx-tests--7-9-%3A-Add-tests-for-PD_RETURNDEFAU... http://www.nabble.com/PrintDlgEx-tests--9-9-%3A-Add-a-test-for-PD_RETURNDEFA... Cheers, Gal On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Juan Lang <juan.lang(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Gal,
+ * This function is necessary in order to match the behaviour on + * Windows, which seems to do all these checks when PrintDlgEx + * is called. It is also necessary in order to replicate a bug in + * PrintDlgExA, where S_OK is returned for invalid DevMode or DevNames.
A test case would be a lot nicer than a comment. --Juan