Re: [5/5] usp10: remote todo_wine

[James Hawkins]

On 12/14/06, Clinton Stimpson <cjstimpson(a)utwire.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Part 5 of 5.
> Remove many todo_wine's from the tests, now that the functions are
> implemented.

You have to remove the todo_wine's in the same patch that fixes the
tests, or the tests will fail for at least one commit.  Patches have
to be atomic and error free, and a failing test is an error.

-- 
James Hawkins