23 Oct
2017
23 Oct
'17
3:07 p.m.
Vincent Povirk <vincent(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
It seemed cleaner to me to do it with a separate header, because it enforces the requirement that our builtin DSM is 1.x and uses no 2.x features. But I can do it the other way if you prefer.
Yes, I don't think that duplicating the header is making anything cleaner. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org