Re: new d3d9/device.ok test always fails here, but not a regression?

[Saulius Krasuckas]

* On Mon, 2 Jan 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
> If an app stops working because some missing feature is added to an 
> existing DLL, it should not be tagged as a regression even though it is 
> from the app's point of view, right?
> (Thinking of the installers for Photoshop CS3 and Visual Studio 2005.) 
> I wonder if we need a separate keyword for that, like 'appregression'.

I would call it 'newfeature' or even 'weaknewfeature' to avoid similarity 
between sound of 'regression' and 'appregression'.

S.