27 Mar
2011
27 Mar
'11
11:34 p.m.
Joshua Beck <jxb091000(a)utdallas.edu> wrote:
Or even better: + for(i = 0; i< 144; i+=4) + { + vertices[i ] *= width; + vertices[++i] *= height; + vertices[++i] *= depth; + }
There shouild be i + 1 and i + 2 instead of two ++i otherwise the loop index gets corrupted.
You mean like this?
+ for(i = 0; i< 144; i+=6) + { + vertices[i ] *= width; + vertices[i + 1] *= height; + vertices[i + 2] *= depth; + }
Looks like I misread the original loop condition. Both your variants are fine. -- Dmitry.