3 Jan
2005
3 Jan
'05
2:19 p.m.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes:
Right. A default implementation could be just:
wine_dbg_sprintf("%x", msg);
Anyway, it would be way cool if we could use the nice dumping functions from spy.
We should be exporting a wine_dbg_msg_{enter,exit}() that we could use them nicely in our window procs.
You can also simply turn on the +message channel and you get nice traces for all the window procs. I don't think there's much point in duplicating that functionality inside the window procs themselves. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org