30 May
2013
30 May
'13
8:59 a.m.
Christian Costa <titan.costa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
and no modern gcc/other compiler that I can find cares. It was probably added because of a tool that warned of the unused parameter ... So it all goes in circles. ;)
Ciao, Marcus
So what about action = NULL instead?
A checker tool should be instructed to ignore that kind of a warning instead. There are many legitimate cases when a function doesn't use all of its parameters, in that cases there is no need to take any special action to silence a warning IMHO. -- Dmitry.