On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.de> writes:
i'm not 100% sure what -DWINE_NO_STRICT should do, but i suspect it should negate the effect of -DSTRICT. The attached patch enables that and lets wine compile with -DSTRICT where WINE_NO_STRICT isn't defined.
WINE_NO_STRICT not only undoes the effect of -DSTRICT, but it also makes handles UINTs, which -DSTRICT is not supposed to do. And the idea was that -D__WINE__ would implicitly force -DSTRICT so that you Ok, that makes sense.
don't have to specify it. But I agree the #ifdefs could be improved so that it still works even if you add -DSTRICT. Something like the patch below should work I think. Yes, it works, could you please commit it?
thanks bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 System Administration Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH Email: mstefani(a)redhat.com Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/ D-70178 Stuttgart