30 Apr
2017
30 Apr
'17
6:13 a.m.
On 30.04.2017 6:29, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
+ for (i = 0; i < size / sizeof(GUID); i += 2) + { + if (!IsEqualGUID(&guids[i], &type->guidMajorType) && + !IsEqualGUID(&guids[i+1], &type->guidSubtype)) + { + ret = TRUE; + break; + } + }
This is confusing. Shouldn't it look for a match?