27 Aug
2010
27 Aug
'10
1:47 p.m.
On 27 August 2010 14:33, Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
clearly outside that range. At first sight I'd say there's an error in the calculation for "mixdev[mixnum].chans" somewhere, that's what ultimately determines the size of the block that's allocated above, and should correspond to the number of lines filled in filllines(), 16 in the log you attached.
Actually, looking a bit at what 6120d7cc14522983fbc38026ab4fcb6e4a68cdf0 actually does, does the attached patch make any difference for you?