9 Oct
2008
9 Oct
'08
9:45 a.m.
"Rob Shearman" <robertshearman(a)gmail.com> writes:
Yes, I have verified that by looking at the dependencies in the makefile for these DLLs. I did check this before sending the patch, but I'm not sure why I didn't see this before.
However, I'm not that happy with depending on a magic name here - is there a way we can put this name into a makefile variable?
Not easily, you'd have to add yet another option to makedep, I'm not sure I see the point. What's wrong with dlldata.c? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org