Re: Win64 patch 3/6 (resend)

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
> "Ge van Geldorp" <ge(a)gse.nl> wrote:
> > --- a/include/wine/server_protocol.h
> > +++ b/include/wine/server_protocol.h
> > @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ struct reply_header
> > struct request_max_size
> > {
> >     int pad[16];
> > +#ifdef _WIN64
> > +    int pad64[10];
> > +#endif
> > };
>
> Why is this required? Is that due to asserts in server/request.c,
> open_master_socket() ? Is changing 'int' to 'long' a better fix?

The best way would be to fix the few offending requests so that we
don't need to make every single request larger.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org