16 May
2008
16 May
'08
7:54 p.m.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
jwhite wrote:
The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case. Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks?
I like it.
I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about letting people build wine without a full complement of development headers. Maybe our configure should have a sanity check at the end, and abort if something optional but very common is missing; we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable configuring in that case if it's really intended. - Dan
We could have dotests check the config.log to see if there were any dependencies missing, and warn/fail as appropriate.