12 Jun
2020
12 Jun
'20
12:32 p.m.
On 11.06.2020 22:13, Matteo Bruni wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:21 PM Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> --- I left behaviour for num == 1 unchanged, but according to the comment it should be 0. We don't seem to have a test for that. You mean for num == 0? That's sort of an invalid value, it shouldn't matter (and returning 1 for that seems safer anyway).
Oh, right, that comment was messed up. Thanks for the review, Jacek