6 Jan
2016
6 Jan
'16
9:32 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)wine.codeweavers.com> wrote:
+ case ALG_ID_SHA384: + CC_SHA384_Update( &hash->u.sha512_ctx, input, size ); + break; + + case ALG_ID_SHA512: + CC_SHA512_Update( &hash->u.sha512_ctx, input, size ); + break;
I missed this when I first saw the patches but in a second look and judging by the surrounding code I guess there is a copy&paste issue here. SHA384 should probably use &hash->u.sha384_ctx, no?