Re: secur32: Fix a failing test in win95

[Paul Vriens]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM, James Hawkins
<jhawkins(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Hawkins
> > <jhawkins(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Changelog:
> > > * Fix a failing test in win95.
> > >
> > > dlls/secur32/tests/main.c |    3 ++-
> > >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Hawkins
> >
> > But if the result is SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION it's not broken is it?
>
> Do you think returning SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION is acceptable
> behavior for Wine?

No of course not. But we tend to use broken() if we think a certain
windows platform is well uh, broken. And we use skip() if it's
accepted behavior.

Cheers,

Paul.