On 28 February 2010 19:11, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/26/2010 11:07 PM, Reece Dunn wrote:
+ todo_wine + ok(broken(supported == (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER | INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA)) || + supported == (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER | INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA | INTERFACE_USES_SECURITY_MANAGER) /* msxml3 SP8+ */, + "Expected (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER | INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA) " + "or (INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_CALLER | INTERFACESAFE_FOR_UNTRUSTED_DATA | INTERFACE_USES_SECURITY_MANAGER), "
Hi Reece,
We usually don't add the broken() possibility as one of the expected outcomes in the ok-message.
I have applied your comment to the tests I have been working on and submitting that as the fix for the failing tests, as I have reworked the tests to extend the coverage. Thanks, - Reece