Re: [PATCH 03/10] jscript: Added NaN value implementation.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > I'd suggest to take advantage of the variant union instead of copying
> > all these glibc definitions. Something like
> >
> > #ifdef NAN
> >     V_R8(&vt) = NAN;
> > #else
> >     V_I8(&vt) = nan_magic_pattern;
> > #endif
>
> The problem is that nan_magic_pattern would have to be 8 bytes and
> AFAIK there is no portable way to do it without ugly casts like in
> attached patch.

Something like (ULONGLONG)0x7ff80000 << 32 should do the trick.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org