Re: Coverity doing scans of Wine codebase!

7 Apr 2006


      Some of the "bugs" it picks up are cases of defensive programming, such as 
checking for a NULL pointer even though the NULL pointer is impossible, given 
the functioning of routines that are being called. What should the policy be 
on such bugs - should we remove the unnecessary check or keep the 
extra-defensive code?

-- 
Troy Rollo - wine(a)troy.rollo.name