On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:40:46PM +0100, Dagfinn Reiakvam wrote:
From: Uberdaff <dagfinn(a)reiakvam.no>
I'm not sure why you're including the From: line, simply leave it out unless you're sending a patch from somebody else.
index 97284ed..62437e0 100644 --- a/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c +++ b/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c @@ -3223,6 +3223,30 @@ DWORD WINAPI ConvertInterfaceNameToLuidW(const WCHAR *name, NET_LUID *luid) }
/****************************************************************** + * ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask (IPHLPAPI.@) + */ +DWORD WINAPI ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(ULONG mask_len, PULONG mask) +{ + if(mask_len > 32) + { + *mask = INADDR_NONE; + return ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER; + } + + if(mask_len == 0) + *mask = 0; + else + { + //IN_ADDR temp; + //temp.S_un.S_addr = 0xffffffff << ( 32 - MaskLength); + //*Mask = temp.S_un.S_un_b.s_b4 + ( temp.S_un.S_un_b.s_b3 <-< 8 ) + ( temp.S_un.S_un_b.s_b2 << 16 ) + ( temp.S_un.S_un_b.s_b1 << 24 );
Why did you leave this old code in here? Just get rid of it. Besides which c++ comments are not acceptable in Wine.
+ *mask = htonl(~0u << (32 - mask_len)); + } + + return NO_ERROR; +} + +/****************************************************************** * if_nametoindex (IPHLPAPI.@) */ IF_INDEX WINAPI IPHLP_if_nametoindex(const char *name) diff --git a/dlls/iphlpapi/tests/iphlpapi.c b/dlls/iphlpapi/tests/iphlpapi.c index 873612d..039d503 100644 --- a/dlls/iphlpapi/tests/iphlpapi.c +++ b/dlls/iphlpapi/tests/iphlpapi.c @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static DWORD (WINAPI *pConvertInterfaceLuidToNameW)(const NET_LUID*,WCHAR*,SIZE_ static DWORD (WINAPI *pConvertInterfaceLuidToNameA)(const NET_LUID*,char*,SIZE_T); static DWORD (WINAPI *pConvertInterfaceNameToLuidA)(const char*,NET_LUID*); static DWORD (WINAPI *pConvertInterfaceNameToLuidW)(const WCHAR*,NET_LUID*); +static DWORD (WINAPI *pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask)(ULONG,PULONG);
static PCHAR (WINAPI *pif_indextoname)(NET_IFINDEX,PCHAR); static NET_IFINDEX (WINAPI *pif_nametoindex)(const char*); @@ -149,6 +150,7 @@ static void loadIPHlpApi(void) pConvertInterfaceLuidToNameW = (void *)GetProcAddress(hLibrary, "ConvertInterfaceLuidToNameW"); pConvertInterfaceNameToLuidA = (void *)GetProcAddress(hLibrary, "ConvertInterfaceNameToLuidA"); pConvertInterfaceNameToLuidW = (void *)GetProcAddress(hLibrary, "ConvertInterfaceNameToLuidW"); + pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask = (void *)GetProcAddress(hLibrary, "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask"); pif_indextoname = (void *)GetProcAddress(hLibrary, "if_indextoname"); pif_nametoindex = (void *)GetProcAddress(hLibrary, "if_nametoindex"); } @@ -2174,6 +2176,67 @@ static void test_GetUnicastIpAddressTable(void) pFreeMibTable(table); }
+static void test_ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(void) +{ + DWORD apiReturn; + ULONG mask; + + if (!pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask) + { + win_skip( "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask not available\n" ); + return; + } + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(0, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == 0, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0x00000000\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(1, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == htonl(0x80000000), + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0x00000080\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(8, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == htonl(0xff000000), + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0x000000ff\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(16, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == htonl(0xffff0000), + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0x0000ffff\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(24, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == htonl(0xffffff00), + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0x00ffffff\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(31, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == htonl(0xfffffffe), + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0xfeffffff\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(32, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == NO_ERROR, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask returned %d, expected NO_ERROR\n", apiReturn); + ok(mask == htonl(0xffffffff), + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected 0xffffffff\n", mask); + + apiReturn = pConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(33, &mask); + ok(apiReturn == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask(32, &Mask) returned %d, expected ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER\n", + apiReturn); + ok(mask == INADDR_NONE, + "ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask Mask value %x, expected INADDR_NONE\n", mask);
This last test would be more convincing if mask were initialized to 0xdeadbeef (or something). The result of the previous test sets it to 0xffffffff which is INADDR_NONE. However, it probably would be better to rewrite this sequence of tests as a loop (from 0 to 33) calculating the expected mask in each case. Huw.