Re: DDraw: Don't destroy complex attached surfaces even if explicitely requested as they will be liquidated anyway when the root is destroyed.

[Stefan Dösinger]

Am Freitag 22 September 2006 16:55 schrieb Elie Morisse:
> A new version of my refcounting patch, lighter and honoring Stefan Dösinger
> proposal.
> Is there any reason why this patch wasn't applied? It looks ok to me, and it 
> complies with the wording of the msdn(complex surfaces can only be destroyed 
> by destroying the root).

It might be good to have a test case, but how can we test if something has 
been destroyed?