Re: [Darwine] RFC: Bug Management (was: wine_ldt_copy)

[Pierre d'Herbemont]

Sorry for cross posting to the wine-devel but I think this may interest the
whole wine community.

Selon Phil Krylov <phil.krylov(a)gmail.com>:
> Fine :) Could you please correct the corresponding To Do entry on the Web
> site?

I can't do it right now, so I'll fix that later. Any way our To Do Section is
not flexible enough.

So that raises a good question: how shall we handle bug reports?

My propositions:

1) Every bug reports handled by darwine(a)bugzilla.opendarwin.org or the
darwine(a)sf Bug Management System.

2) Every bug reports handled by bugzilla.winehq.org.

3) - Wine related bugs (including darwin port specific bugs) handled by
bugzilla.winehq.org.
   - bugs that are darwine related and not wine specific (WineHelper bugs,
installer bugs, sdk bugs, ... ) handled by darwine(a)bugzilla.opendarwin.org or
darwine(a)sf.

Solution 1) is the worst, since we'll have to deal with bug duplication between
the darwine BMS and the winehq BMS.

Solution 2) is doable but probably not desired.

So I think we should go for 3). Whereas it seems to be the most confusing
solution for bug reporters, the separation wine code/darwine distrib is
clear. Anyway bug reporters usually read the "how to bug report" before
submitting a bug, do they?

Would solution 3) be acceptable?

Pierre.