[PATCH] oleaut32: Fix RegisterTypeLib prototype.

[Jacek Caban]

From: Kevin Puetz <PuetzKevinA(a)JohnDeere.com>

Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com>
---
  dlls/oleaut32/typelib.c | 15 ++++-----------
  include/oleauto.h       |  2 +-
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?

Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=56933

Your paranoid android.


=== debian10 (32 bit report) ===

oleaut32:
Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7e8ef421).

Report errors:
oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)

=== debian10 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===

oleaut32:
Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7eb69421).

Report errors:
oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)

=== debian10 (32 bit WoW report) ===

oleaut32:
Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7e8ef421).

Report errors:
oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)

=== debian10 (64 bit WoW report) ===

oleaut32:
Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7e8ef421).

Report errors:
oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)

[Fabian Maurer]

Out of curiosity, what was the problem with the prototype? Shouldn't it be the
same as the actual function?


Regards,
Fabian Maurer

[Jacek Caban]

On 9/25/19 9:51 PM, Fabian Maurer wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what was the problem with the prototype? Shouldn't it be the
> same as the actual function?

It used WCHAR* instead of const WCHAR*. With the patch, the prototype is 
the same as the implementation.


Jacek