Re: [5/5] gdiplus: Add test for page transform in metafiles.

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4302

Your paranoid android.


=== wxppro (32 bit metafile) ===
metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991
metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196

=== wvista (32 bit metafile) ===
metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991
metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196

=== w2008s64 (32 bit metafile) ===
metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991
metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196

=== w7pro64 (32 bit metafile) ===
metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991
metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196

=== w2008s64 (64 bit metafile) ===
metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279999
metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196

=== w7pro64 (64 bit metafile) ===
metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991
metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196