Re: [5/5] gdiplus: Add test for page transform in metafiles.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4302 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit metafile) === metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991 metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196 === wvista (32 bit metafile) === metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991 metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196 === w2008s64 (32 bit metafile) === metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991 metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196 === w7pro64 (32 bit metafile) === metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991 metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196 === w2008s64 (64 bit metafile) === metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279999 metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196 === w7pro64 (64 bit metafile) === metafile.c:872: Test failed: Expected 72.000000, got 81.279991 metafile.c:880: Test failed: Expected 00000168, got 00000196
participants (1)
-
Marvin