Wine and Photoshop in news
Check this link out Its about Wine and Photoshop compatibility. http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?page=business05_aug01_2006 Can we also try to improve the photoshop compatibility with wine. Today will download the demo and try it on wine current git.
On 8/1/06, Jaap Stolk <jwstolk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
....business05_aug01_2006
"with the latest beta version being 0.9.8"
is this a re-print or something?
It's fresh, but with typos, I think. There were backslashes missing in a path; maybe there's a 1 missing from 0.9.18...
I'm going to CC the author of the article here, as it looks like he's using my packages. On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:58 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On 8/1/06, Jaap Stolk <jwstolk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
....business05_aug01_2006
"with the latest beta version being 0.9.8"
is this a re-print or something?
It's fresh, but with typos, I think. There were backslashes missing in a path; maybe there's a 1 missing from 0.9.18...
Actually, I don't think it's a typo. 0.9.8 is the version that's in the Ubuntu default repositories (which is how he seems to have installed it), which are frozen. 0.9.18 is the latest version I have packaged, however. I wonder if he's using the later packages available from winehq, or if the review was written with the default version in the repositories? He's clearly been on the Ubuntu forums, where it's pretty easy to discover the winehq APT repository: http://winehq.org/site/download-deb Thanks, Scott Ritchie
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:10 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
I'm going to CC the author of the article here, as it looks like he's using my packages.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:58 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On 8/1/06, Jaap Stolk <jwstolk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
....business05_aug01_2006
"with the latest beta version being 0.9.8"
is this a re-print or something?
It's fresh, but with typos, I think. There were backslashes missing in a path; maybe there's a 1 missing from 0.9.18...
Actually, I don't think it's a typo. 0.9.8 is the version that's in the Ubuntu default repositories (which is how he seems to have installed it), which are frozen.
0.9.18 is the latest version I have packaged, however. I wonder if he's using the later packages available from winehq, or if the review was written with the default version in the repositories? He's clearly been on the Ubuntu forums, where it's pretty easy to discover the winehq APT repository:
After contacting the author of the article, it seems as though he was using the version of Wine in the default repositories, which is 0.9.9 (and not 0.9.8 as I originally thought). Thanks, Scott Ritchie
Well I tried installing PhotoShop CS2 using 0.9.19. It is not getting installed, we still got msi bugs. On 8/11/06, Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:10 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
I'm going to CC the author of the article here, as it looks like he's using my packages.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:58 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On 8/1/06, Jaap Stolk <jwstolk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
....business05_aug01_2006
"with the latest beta version being 0.9.8"
is this a re-print or something?
It's fresh, but with typos, I think. There were backslashes missing in a path; maybe there's a 1 missing from 0.9.18...
Actually, I don't think it's a typo. 0.9.8 is the version that's in the Ubuntu default repositories (which is how he seems to have installed it), which are frozen.
0.9.18 is the latest version I have packaged, however. I wonder if he's using the later packages available from winehq, or if the review was written with the default version in the repositories? He's clearly been on the Ubuntu forums, where it's pretty easy to discover the winehq APT repository:
After contacting the author of the article, it seems as though he was using the version of Wine in the default repositories, which is 0.9.9 (and not 0.9.8 as I originally thought).
Thanks, Scott Ritchie
participants (4)
-
Dan Kegel -
Jaap Stolk -
Scott Ritchie -
Vijay Kiran Kamuju