Re: user32: Do not allow a change of capture if the currently capture window is a menu unless explicitly specified (try2)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Peter Dons Tychsen <donpedro(a)tdcadsl.dk> writes:
> @@ -85,6 +85,17 @@ BOOL set_capture_window( HWND hwnd, UINT gui_flags, HWND *prev_ret )
>      HWND previous = 0;
>      UINT flags = 0;
>      BOOL ret;
> +    GUITHREADINFO info;
> +    if(!GetGUIThreadInfo(GetCurrentThreadId(), &info))
> +    {
> +        return FALSE;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* if in menu mode, reject all requests to change focus, except if the menu bit is set */
> +    if((info.flags & GUI_INMENUMODE) && !(gui_flags & GUI_INMENUMODE))
> +    {
> +        return FALSE;
> +    }

This should be handled on the server side.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

user32: Do not allow a change of capture if the currently capture window is a menu unless explicitly specified (try2)

[Peter Dons Tychsen]

Hello A.

I was afraid you were going to say that! :-)

My initial change actually did that, but then i ran into the problem
that i need the request to fail, but not set an error-code. I could
push/pop the current error code in user32 but that seemed a bit ugly. I
could also single out that error code and then only translate the
others. But what error code should be used then? Also seemed a bit ugly.

Instead i have added a new member to the response to check if the
request was "allowed". Seemed like the cleanest solution. Is this
acceptable?

I have attached a new patch which does this.

Thanks,

/pedro

On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 10:06 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Peter Dons Tychsen <donpedro(a)tdcadsl.dk> writes:
> > @@ -85,6 +85,17 @@ BOOL set_capture_window( HWND hwnd, UINT gui_flags, HWND *prev_ret )
> >      HWND previous = 0;
> >      UINT flags = 0;
> >      BOOL ret;
> > +    GUITHREADINFO info;
> > +    if(!GetGUIThreadInfo(GetCurrentThreadId(), &info))
> > +    {
> > +        return FALSE;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* if in menu mode, reject all requests to change focus, except if the menu bit is set */
> > +    if((info.flags & GUI_INMENUMODE) && !(gui_flags & GUI_INMENUMODE))
> > +    {
> > +        return FALSE;
> > +    }
>
> This should be handled on the server side.

user32: Do not allow a change of capture if the currently capture window is a menu unless explicitly specified (try2)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Peter Dons Tychsen <donpedro(a)tdcadsl.dk> writes:
> Hello A.
>
> I was afraid you were going to say that! :-)
>
> My initial change actually did that, but then i ran into the problem
> that i need the request to fail, but not set an error-code. I could
> push/pop the current error code in user32 but that seemed a bit ugly. I
> could also single out that error code and then only translate the
> others. But what error code should be used then? Also seemed a bit ugly.

Simply use wine_server_call instead of wine_server_call_err.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

user32: Do not allow a change of capture if the currently capture window is a menu unless explicitly specified (try2)

[Peter Dons Tychsen]

> Simply use wine_server_call instead of wine_server_call_err.

That is my point. That will not work. The existing the error codes
*should* be translated, but this new one should not. So if i use
wine_server_call i would have to filter which ones to translate
manually. 

It would also give me the problem of which error code to emit from the
wine-server, as real windows does not set an error code at all in this
case (hence the problem). I think it would be a bit naughty emitting
errors from the server and them removing them with a filter later. Does
not seem clean.

But if you want me to do this, then what NT error code should the server
use? I imagine that no matter what unused error code i selected the
response would be "this error code i not meant for that purpose" (which
would probably be right as there is no error code for this purpose).

I still feel that an extra field in the response in the cleanest (the
way my patch did it).

Sorry for being so verbal, but i know that you are touchy about the
server :-)

Thanks,

/pedro

user32: Do not allow a change of capture if the currently capture window is a menu unless explicitly specified (try2)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Peter Dons Tychsen <donpedro(a)tdcadsl.dk> writes:
> > Simply use wine_server_call instead of wine_server_call_err.
>
> That is my point. That will not work. The existing the error codes
> *should* be translated, but this new one should not. So if i use
> wine_server_call i would have to filter which ones to translate
> manually.

Is there actually an app that depends on this?  user32 functions don't
handle last error consistently so it seems pretty unlikely that anything
would depend on this.
> But if you want me to do this, then what NT error code should the server
> use? I imagine that no matter what unused error code i selected the
> response would be "this error code i not meant for that purpose" (which
> would probably be right as there is no error code for this purpose).

If there's no appropriate code just use some generic error like "access
denied" or "invalid parameter".

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

user32: Do not allow a change of capture if the currently capture window is a menu unless explicitly specified (try2)

[Peter Dons Tychsen]

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 14:00 -0600, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Is there actually an app that depends on this?

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9369

This bug requires the function to fail, but you are probably right that
no-one checks the error code. I will change the patch/test to be less
pedantic.

Thanks for the fast reply,

/pedro