Re: server: Add a call for retrieving the image file name of a process.
Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
--- dlls/ntdll/process.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- dlls/ntdll/tests/info.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ server/process.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ server/protocol.def | 9 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
You should use the existing get_dll_info request for that. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
--- dlls/ntdll/process.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- dlls/ntdll/tests/info.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ server/process.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ server/protocol.def | 9 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
You should use the existing get_dll_info request for that.
get_dll_info doesn't appear to be suitable for this purpose. We don't know what the base address of the EXE is and the call doesn't return the required size for the filename. -- Rob Shearman
Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
get_dll_info doesn't appear to be suitable for this purpose. We don't know what the base address of the EXE is and the call doesn't return the required size for the filename.
Well, you have to extend it a bit to support that, but it's better than adding a new request. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Robert Shearman