dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c portability breakage

[Gerald Pfeifer]

The following change to dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c

  revision 1.79
  date: 2003/03/15 00:54:12;  author: julliard;  state: Exp;  lines: +231 -73
  Robert Reif <reif(a)earthlink.net>
  Added support for multiple direct sound devices.

unfortunately breaks compilation on FreeBSD:

  audio.c: In function `OSS_WaveOutInit':
  audio.c:501: syntax error before `info'
  audio.c:502: `SOUND_MIXER_INFO' undeclared (first use in this function)
  audio.c:502: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
  audio.c:502: for each function it appears in.)
  audio.c:502: `info' undeclared (first use in this function)
  audio.c: In function `OSS_WaveInInit':
  audio.c:634: syntax error before `info'
  audio.c:635: `SOUND_MIXER_INFO' undeclared (first use in this function)
  audio.c:635: `info' undeclared (first use in this function)

As far as I can see mixer_info does not exist on FreeBSD 4.7 (at least).

I'm afraid I won't have the time to investigate this into more detail by
myself; would you mind having a look?

Thanks,
Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer(a)dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

[Alexandre Julliard]

Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer(a)dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
> As far as I can see mixer_info does not exist on FreeBSD 4.7 (at least).
>
> I'm afraid I won't have the time to investigate this into more detail by
> myself; would you mind having a look?

I added a couple of #ifdefs, it's not really the right solution but it
should hopefully get you going. Let me know if it still doesn't work
for you.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.com

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I added a couple of #ifdefs, it's not really the right solution but it
> should hopefully get you going. Let me know if it still doesn't work
> for you.

It builds like a charm now, thanks!

The patch below is a most minor followup to avoid (warnings on) unused
variables.

Gerald

ChangeLog:
Avoid unused variables on systems without SOUND_MIXER_INFO.

Index: audio.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c,v
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -u -3 -p -r1.80 audio.c
--- audio.c	15 Mar 2003 22:23:27 -0000	1.80
+++ audio.c	16 Mar 2003 09:09:56 -0000
@@ -491,7 +491,10 @@ static BOOL OSS_WaveOutInit(OSS_DEVICE*
 {
     int rc,arg;
     int f,c,r;
+#ifdef SOUND_MIXER_INFO
     int mixer;
+#endif
+
     TRACE("(%p) %s\n", ossdev, ossdev->dev_name);

     if (OSS_OpenDevice(ossdev, O_WRONLY, NULL, 0,-1,-1,-1) != 0) return FALSE;
@@ -626,7 +629,10 @@ static BOOL OSS_WaveInInit(OSS_DEVICE* o
 {
     int rc,arg;
     int f,c,r;
+#ifdef SOUND_MIXER_INFO
     int mixer;
+#endif
+
     TRACE("(%p) %s\n", ossdev, ossdev->dev_name);

     if (OSS_OpenDevice(ossdev, O_RDONLY, NULL, 0,-1,-1,-1) != 0) return FALSE;

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On March 16, 2003 04:12 am, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> int f,c,r;
> +#ifdef SOUND_MIXER_INFO
>      int mixer;
> +#endif
> +

Please don't add even more ugly ifdefs just to avoid some warnings.

-- 
Dimi.

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > +#ifdef SOUND_MIXER_INFO
> >      int mixer;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > Please don't add even more ugly ifdefs just to avoid some warnings.

How else do you suggest we/I detect those code regressions that compiler
warnings indicate?

Some may seem "cosmetic", but many of the patches I have submitted really
were related to actual problems in the code; keeping the number of
warnings to a sensible level really helps.

And I have studied every single warning in the past year or so and
contributed many portability fixes as well as fixes really affecting
GNU/Linux as well.

I really appreciate that Alexandre and most other developers care about
portability; trying to eliminate warnings is somehow part of that.

Gerald

PS: Or would you prefer a dummy block

  #ifdef SOUND_MIXER_INFO
  {
  int mixer;
  ....
  }
  #endif

instead of two #ifdefs?
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer(a)dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On March 16, 2003 11:27 am, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> PS: Or would you prefer a dummy block
>
> #ifdef SOUND_MIXER_INFO
>   {
>   int mixer;
>   ....
>   }
>   #endif
>
> instead of two #ifdefs?

No, I don't. What about moving the #ifdef just around the

	if (ioctl(mixer, SOUND_MIXER_INFO, &info) >= 0) {

Will that work?

-- 
Dimi.