Re: wcmd: Fix redirecting a pipe to another pipe
2009/1/11 Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu>: + /* If a redirect is immediately followed by '&' (ie. 2>&1) then + do nor process that ampersand as an AND operator */ Shouldn't that be "do *not* process that ampersand"? - Reece
Indeed, apparently my fingers are too fat for my keyboard. Do comment typos involve a resubmit? Erich Hoover ehoover(a)mines.edu On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2009/1/11 Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu>:
+ /* If a redirect is immediately followed by '&' (ie. 2>&1) then + do nor process that ampersand as an AND operator */
Shouldn't that be "do *not* process that ampersand"?
- Reece
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> wrote:
Indeed, apparently my fingers are too fat for my keyboard. Do comment typos involve a resubmit?
Erich Hoover ehoover(a)mines.edu
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2009/1/11 Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu>:
+ /* If a redirect is immediately followed by '&' (ie. 2>&1) then + do nor process that ampersand as an AND operator */
Shouldn't that be "do *not* process that ampersand"?
- Reece
Please. Also, please bottom post on wine mailing lists. Thanks! -- -Austin
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Also, please bottom post on wine mailing lists.
Sorry, I forget for short messages and gmail's reply system always sticks the cursor at the top. Erich Hoover ehoover(a)mines.edu
participants (3)
-
Austin English -
Erich Hoover -
Reece Dunn