Re: [PATCH 6/6] user32: Add support for sequence-based animated cursors.

[Henri Verbeet]

On 10 March 2011 07:42, Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> wrote:
> @@ -940,6 +954,7 @@ done:
>  #define ANI_seq__ID RIFF_FOURCC('s', 'e', 'q', ' ')
>  #define ANI_fram_ID RIFF_FOURCC('f', 'r', 'a', 'm')
>  #define ANI_rate_ID RIFF_FOURCC('r', 'a', 't', 'e')
> +#define ANI_seq_ID  RIFF_FOURCC('s', 'e', 'q', ' ')
> Just happened to notice this, but I doubt there's much point in having
> two different defines for sequence chunks.

[PATCH 6/6] user32: Add support for sequence-based animated cursors.

[Erich Hoover]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 07:42, Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> wrote:
> > @@ -940,6 +954,7 @@ done:
> >  #define ANI_seq__ID RIFF_FOURCC('s', 'e', 'q', ' ')
> >  ...
> > +#define ANI_seq_ID  RIFF_FOURCC('s', 'e', 'q', ' ')
> > Just happened to notice this, but I doubt there's much point in having
> > two different defines for sequence chunks.

Thank you for spotting this mistake, I must have a looked right over it.

Erich Hoover
ehoover(a)mines.edu