Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Fixed Hex(try 2)

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12560

Your paranoid android.


=== w2000pro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== wxppro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w2003std (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w7u (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w8 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found

[PATCH] vbscript: Fixed Hex(try 2)

[Shuai Meng]

testbot：
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12562

Hi all, is there anything to do to improve this patch?
Thanks in advance.

2015-04-01 12:21 GMT+08:00 Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org>:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12560
>
> Your paranoid android.
>
> === w2000pro (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === wxppro (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w2003std (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w7u (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w8 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
> No test summary line found

[PATCH] vbscript: Fixed Hex(try 2)

[Piotr Caban]

On 04/01/15 08:17, Shuai Meng wrote:
> Hi all, is there anything to do to improve this patch?
> The patch looks good for me.

Thanks,
Piotr