Re: [lostwages] Add WBL 3.0 (RHEL 3.0 compatible) to the list of RH distros

[Andreas Mohr]

Hi,

On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:14:58PM -0400, Vincent Béron wrote:
> Since I finally had the time to install it, lets provide Wine binaries
> for it (it's been asked in the past).
>
> Changelog:
> Add WBL 3.0 (RHEL 3.0 compatible) to the list of RH distros.
> This is not really correct.
> Google "RHEL WBEL" vs. "RHEL WBL" shows an overwhelmingly clear result,
> and whiteboxlinux.org also refers to itself as White Box Enterprise Linux
> in the page title (plus it mentions WBEL on the home page!).
> It does list White Box Linux, however (although, as mentioned before,
> this is much less common).

Andreas Mohr

[lostwages] Add WBL 3.0 (RHEL 3.0 compatible) to the list of RH distros

[Vincent Béron]

Le lun 16/08/2004 à 03:48, Andreas Mohr a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:14:58PM -0400, Vincent Béron wrote:
> > Since I finally had the time to install it, lets provide Wine binaries
> > for it (it's been asked in the past).
> >
> > Changelog:
> > Add WBL 3.0 (RHEL 3.0 compatible) to the list of RH distros.
> > This is not really correct.
> > Google "RHEL WBEL" vs. "RHEL WBL" shows an overwhelmingly clear result,
> > and whiteboxlinux.org also refers to itself as White Box Enterprise Linux
> > in the page title (plus it mentions WBEL on the home page!).
> > It does list White Box Linux, however (although, as mentioned before,
> > this is much less common).

Right, I (wrongly) based it on their website name (whiteboxlinux.org).

I'll send an updated patch shortly.

Vincent