Re: SHAllocShared fixes

[Alexandre Julliard]

Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
> This actually calls for two more notes:
>  * This looks very much what one would get by calling the corresponding
> functions in shlwapi (which seems much more complete). However in
> shell32 there is talk of sending messages around (WM_USER+2) so maybe
> it's the same concept but a different implementation?

The WM_USER+2 thing is something a specific caller was doing, it's not
part of the function itself. I think the shell32 functions should
simply forward to the shlwapi ones.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org