Re: [1/2] explorer: Initial implementation of desktop launchers.
Hello Hans, On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Hans Leidekker <hans(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
+ hr = SHGetKnownFolderPath( &FOLDERID_Desktop, 0, NULL, &desktop_folder ); + if (FAILED( hr )) + { + WINE_ERR("Could not get user desktop folder\n"); + return; + } + hr = SHGetKnownFolderPath( &FOLDERID_PublicDesktop, 0, NULL, &desktop_folder_public ); + if (FAILED( hr )) + { + WINE_ERR("Could not get public desktop folder\n"); + CoTaskMemFree( desktop_folder ); + return; + }
Does KF_FLAG_CREATE look better here? Other wise every time a new wineprefix created there is an err output. Maybe I'm missing something here, thanks for your work. -- Regards, Qian Hong - http://www.winehq.org
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 03:30 +0800, Qian Hong wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Hans Leidekker <hans(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
+ hr = SHGetKnownFolderPath( &FOLDERID_Desktop, 0, NULL, &desktop_folder ); + if (FAILED( hr )) + { + WINE_ERR("Could not get user desktop folder\n"); + return; + } + hr = SHGetKnownFolderPath( &FOLDERID_PublicDesktop, 0, NULL, &desktop_folder_public ); + if (FAILED( hr )) + { + WINE_ERR("Could not get public desktop folder\n"); + CoTaskMemFree( desktop_folder ); + return; + }
Does KF_FLAG_CREATE look better here? Other wise every time a new
Yes, that makes sense.
participants (2)
-
Hans Leidekker -
Qian Hong