Re: [PATCH 4/4] mshtml: Added IHTMLElement::outerText tests.

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21790

Your paranoid android.


=== wxppro (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== wvistau64 (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w7u (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w7pro64 (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w8 (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w864 (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w1064 (32 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== wvistau64 (64 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w7pro64 (64 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w864 (64 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

=== w1064 (64 bit dom) ===
dom.c:6968: Test failed: put_outerText failed: 00000000
dom.c:6971: Test failed: expected len = 2, got 1

[PATCH 4/4] mshtml: Added IHTMLElement::outerText tests.

[Jacek Caban]

On 03/30/16 19:25, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21790
>
> Your paranoid android.

It seems that most IE version don't have limitation for usage with table
elements, so there is no reason for us to have one. Please ignore the
patch series, I will send better version tomorrow.

Jacek