Re: winehq: Fix some HTML markup

[Jeremy Newman]

The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to 
convert the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in 
while still in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C 
validation. I am still willing to live with non-valid working HTML to 
save some work down the road.

-N

André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
>  templates/de/about.template         |    2 +-
>  templates/de/contributing.template  |    8 +++---
>  templates/de/download.template      |   10 +++---
>  templates/de/help.template          |   16 ++++++------
>  templates/en/about.template         |    2 +-
>  templates/en/contributing.template  |    8 +++---
>  templates/en/documentation.template |   48 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  templates/en/download.template      |   10 +++---
>  templates/en/help.template          |   16 ++++++------
>  templates/fr/about.template         |    2 +-
>  templates/pl/about.template         |    2 +-
>  templates/pl/download.template      |   10 +++---
>  templates/pl/help.template          |   16 ++++++------
>  templates/pt/about.template         |    2 +-
>  templates/pt/contributing.template  |    8 +++---
>  15 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

winehq: Fix some HTML markup

[David Gerard]

2009/9/10 Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com>:
> The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to convert
> the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in while still
> in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C validation. I am
> still willing to live with non-valid working HTML to save some work down the
> road.

XHTML is officially no longer developed - the future is HTML5, apparently.


- d.

winehq: Fix some HTML markup

[Reece Dunn]

2009/9/10 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>:
> 2009/9/10 Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com>:
> > The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to convert
> > the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in while still
> > in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C validation. I am
> > still willing to live with non-valid working HTML to save some work down the
> > road.
>
> XHTML is officially no longer developed - the future is HTML5, apparently.

XHTML 1.0 is essentially HTML as XML. Work on XHTML2 has stopped.
HTML5 still supports the XML form (see
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#the-xhtml-syntax)
which supports XML namespaces (e.g. for MathML or SVG inline markup).

- Reece

winehq: Fix some HTML markup

[Jeremy Newman]

Reece Dunn wrote:
> 2009/9/10 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>:
> > 2009/9/10 Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com>:
> > > The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to convert
> > > the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in while still
> > > in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C validation. I am
> > > still willing to live with non-valid working HTML to save some work down the
> > > road.
> > > XHTML is officially no longer developed - the future is HTML5, apparently.
>
> XHTML 1.0 is essentially HTML as XML. Work on XHTML2 has stopped.
> HTML5 still supports the XML form (see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#the-xhtml-syntax)
> which supports XML namespaces (e.g. for MathML or SVG inline markup).

I'm happy to see the more strict XHTML die. I preferred the looser flow 
of HTML4 anyway.

-N