re: ntdll: Define PATH_MAX when needed

[Dan Kegel]

When is PATH_MAX not defined?

It's part of posix (see
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/limits.h.html
)

Are you trying to build on Gnu Hurd?

ntdll: Define PATH_MAX when needed

[André Hentschel]

Am 12.10.2011 23:53, schrieb Dan Kegel:
> When is PATH_MAX not defined?
>
> It's part of posix (see
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/limits.h.html
> )
>
> Are you trying to build on Gnu Hurd?

Yes that's for Hurd. Austin already pointed out dynamic allocation might be a better solution, so...

-- 

Best Regards, André Hentschel

ntdll: Define PATH_MAX when needed

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

André Hentschel <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> wrote:
> Am 12.10.2011 23:53, schrieb Dan Kegel:
> > When is PATH_MAX not defined?
> >
> > It's part of posix (see
> > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/limits.h.html
> > )
> >
> > Are you trying to build on Gnu Hurd?
>
> Yes that's for Hurd. Austin already pointed out dynamic allocation might be a better solution, so...

Notice that PATH_MAX and MAX_PATH are completely different things going
from different sources which can't be replaced by each other.

-- 
Dmitry.