eric pouech <eric.pouech(a)wanadoo.fr> writes:
the executable made out of the sources in specmaker dir can now be launched under 3 different names: - specmaker: you keep all the old features of specmaker (except -S option) - winedemangle: this replaces the -S option of specmaker - pedump: PE (and .DBG) file dumping utility... lots of PE dir dumping still
This seems to duplicate a lot of code that is in cvdump. Are there still things that cvdump does that your pedump doesn't support, or should I remove cvdump completely? Also I'm not convinced we need a separate winedemangle binary, we are already installing a bit too many things in /usr/bin. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com
This seems to duplicate a lot of code that is in cvdump. Are there still things that cvdump does that your pedump doesn't support, or should I remove cvdump completely? yes I forgot to mention that I reintegrated cvdump inside it, so cvdump can be dropped
Also I'm not convinced we need a separate winedemangle binary, we are already installing a bit too many things in /usr/bin. in fact, I have been wondering on how to set this up I hesitated between having a single name for the exec, and switching between the different modes (specmaker, dump, demangling) with command line options, or generating several execs (in fact a single one and several sym links)
I choose the later because I didn't like to have a dump utility named specmaker... however, we can go back to the former, and go for another name ;-) A+ -- --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) "The future will be better tomorrow", Vice President Dan Quayle
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
eric pouech