Re: Is it time to delete wineinstall?
Besides, on the wine-users alias, new users who install RPMs have no idea there is a config file because the RPMs don't create it for them. The config file is meant to go ASAP, so that is a good thing. Most users use RPMs and are quite happy with them, and it causes less support hassle. It may be a redundant feature, but "configure/ make/ make install" is definately not a replacement for "ease of use." ;) Then as other have said wineinstall should just contain ./configure && make && su -c 'make install'
Ivan. ____________________________________________________________ Libero ADSL: navighi gratis a 1.2 Mega, senza canone e costi di attivazione. Abbonati subito su http://www.libero.it
--- Ivan Leo Puoti <puoti(a)inwind.it> wrote:
Besides, on the wine-users alias, new users who install RPMs have no idea there is a config file because the RPMs don't create it for them. The config file is meant to go ASAP, so that is a good thing. Most users use RPMs and are quite happy with them, and it causes less support hassle. It may be a redundant feature, but "configure/ make/ make install" is definately not a replacement for "ease of use." ;) Then as other have said wineinstall should just contain ./configure && make && su -c 'make install'
Ivan.
Sounds good to me as long as the end result is the same. :) Hiji ===== M-Halo: It's Electronic Rock - http://www.mhalo.com/ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com
participants (2)
-
Ivan Leo Puoti -
M-Halo